MY TEACHING PHILOSOPHY
In my opinion, the subject of economics
is important and useful. Knowledge
of economics allows a person to make better personal decisions and act as a more
informed citizen. In spite of the
obvious benefits of learning economics economic illiteracy is widespread.
It is part of my life’s work to do what I can do to reduce economic
illiteracy. I sometimes joke with my
fellow economists that there is so much to do and so little time.
How does one accomplish this goal of reducing economic illiteracy?
That is something I have been struggling with for more than 30 years.
I have experimented with many techniques – some successful many not.
Over the years I have developed some beliefs of what works for me and
what doesn’t. The result is my
philosophy of teaching.
I think Keynes said it best. According
to Keynes:
“The theory of economics does not
furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately applicable to policy.
It is a method rather than a doctrine, an apparatus of the mind, a
technique of thinking which helps its possessor to draw correct conclusions.”
These are simple but powerful principles.
But just reciting these principles over and over again in a mindless
chant does not mean that they are learned. Based
on my experience, the best way to teach economics is application.
That is, state the principle and work through its implications as an
abstract model. The next step and
most important step is application. That
is, apply the model in a real-world situation.
This is a key step in the learning process.
It is here that the student begins to see how thinking by the application
of models allows one to draw useful conclusions.
The next step is to apply the model in another real-world situation.
The point of all this is that teaching economics requires exposition of
theories but it does not stop there. These
theories must be applied over and over again until the student sees the general
applicability of these principles in understanding a wide range of phenomena.
Making seemingly esoteric principles practical and useful to the student
is the goal. It is gratifying to
hear students begin to use terms like tradeoffs, opportunity costs, incentives,
etc. and see their little smile as they use the words telling you that yes I
understand.
Whether this approach is taught in a
lecture format or a more intimate question and answer situation with a few
people depends on the circumstances. Both
can work as a teaching technique. The
key is to get the student actively involved in the process.
That is, continually asking the students to help you explore the problem
step-by-step. Let’s work together
on this problem is what I tell them. Once
again, this depends on the skills of the professor and the interaction between
the professor and the student. I
always like to start the class with a little summary of what we are going to do
that day and what principles we are going to learn.
I then try to end the class with a restatement and summary of the
principles we have learned that day. This
reinforcement is very helpful. Also
as we proceed through the course we find that we are reusing earlier-learned
principles over and over again. I
try to point this out.
In final summary, the reason why I like
economics is because it is useful in understanding a wide range of phenomena.
It is practical and gives you a framework by which the world makes more
sense. I try to convey this same
appreciation and understanding to my students.